CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.695 > 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.756 ± 0.140 > 0.687 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.649 > 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.749 < 0.852
Total TP 290 > 236
Total TN 61809 < 61919
Total FP 140 > 59
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 4
Total FP INCONS 84 > 37
Total FP COMP 43 > 18
Total FN 157 < 211
P-value 2.86595104665e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 290
Total TN 61809
Total FP 140
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 157
Total Scores
MCC 0.695
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.756 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 236
Total TN 61919
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 211
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.528
Positive Predictive Value 0.852
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2KUU_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 5
2KUV_A 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 5
2KUW_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.