CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.602 > 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.113 > 0.588 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.565 > 0.383
Positive Predictive Value 0.646 < 0.867
Total TP 470 > 319
Total TN 209863 < 210223
Total FP 308 > 61
Total FP CONTRA 49 > 11
Total FP INCONS 209 > 38
Total FP COMP 50 > 12
Total FN 362 < 513
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 470
Total TN 209863
Total FP 308
Total FP CONTRA 49
Total FP INCONS 209
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 362
Total Scores
MCC 0.602
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.565
Positive Predictive Value 0.646
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 319
Total TN 210223
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 513
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.383
Positive Predictive Value 0.867
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 1 0 1 0 5
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2L1F_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 2062 4 0 4 0 10
2L1F_B 0.64 0.56 0.74 14 2126 5 0 5 0 11
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
2XXA_G 0.46 0.21 1.00 9 5142 0 0 0 0 33
3A3A_A 0.71 0.51 1.00 19 3636 0 0 0 0 18
3IVN_B 0.61 0.48 0.79 15 2327 4 2 2 0 16
3IYQ_A 0.38 0.21 0.69 20 60697 13 5 4 4 74
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3LA5_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2466 3 1 2 0 18
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.