CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.655 > 0.367
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.681 ± 0.099 > 0.197 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.587 > 0.151
Positive Predictive Value 0.737 < 0.900
Total TP 454 > 117
Total TN 69012 < 69498
Total FP 188 > 15
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 0
Total FP INCONS 142 > 13
Total FP COMP 26 > 2
Total FN 319 < 656
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 454
Total TN 69012
Total FP 188
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 142
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 319
Total Scores
MCC 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.681 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.737
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XKV_B 0.45 0.45 0.45 9 4540 25 0 11 14 11
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3463 20 2 18 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3IVN_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 2325 2 1 1 0 12
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 0 22 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 69498
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 656
Total Scores
MCC 0.367
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.197 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.151
Positive Predictive Value 0.900
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 406 0 0 0 0 11
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.79 0.71 0.88 15 1111 2 0 2 0 6
2KUU_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 14 1112 3 0 2 1 7
2KUV_A 0.77 0.68 0.88 15 1111 2 0 2 0 7
2KUW_A 0.52 0.48 0.59 10 1111 7 0 7 0 11
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 20
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 17
2WWQ_V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 28
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4560 0 0 0 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 27
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
2ZZN_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 27
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 28
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3655 0 0 0 0 37
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2701 0 0 0 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 32
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.