CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna NanoFolder
MCC 0.654 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.729 ± 0.228 > 0.674 ± 0.307
Sensitivity 0.567 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.764 > 0.557
Total TP 68 > 64
Total TN 8829 > 8803
Total FP 22 < 52
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 6
Total FP INCONS 18 < 45
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 52 < 56
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 68
Total TN 8829
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.729 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.764
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 8803
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.307
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.557
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.