CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.807 > 0.753
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.828 ± 0.103 > 0.756 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.727 > 0.603
Positive Predictive Value 0.900 < 0.946
Total TP 253 > 210
Total TN 24648 < 24707
Total FP 30 > 14
Total FP CONTRA 3 > 0
Total FP INCONS 25 > 12
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 95 < 138
P-value 2.22210847902e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 253
Total TN 24648
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.807
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.828 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.727
Positive Predictive Value 0.900
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 2325 2 1 1 0 12
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 210
Total TN 24707
Total FP 14
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.753
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.756 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.603
Positive Predictive Value 0.946
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2KUU_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 5
2KUV_A 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 5
2KUW_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.