CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna Vsfold4
MCC 0.665 > 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.063 > 0.661 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.599 > 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 < 0.775
Total TP 1001 > 935
Total TN 126542 < 126675
Total FP 396 > 298
Total FP CONTRA 40 > 30
Total FP INCONS 298 > 241
Total FP COMP 58 > 27
Total FN 671 < 737
P-value 1.37177523642e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1001
Total TN 126542
Total FP 396
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 298
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 671
Total Scores
MCC 0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.599
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 89

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 0
2K63_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 1
2K66_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KEZ_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.58 0.54 0.64 7 550 4 0 4 0 6
2KU0_A - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 691 7 1 6 0 11
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1468 3 1 2 0 5
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1936 17 1 16 0 26
2WW9_F - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 293 1 0 1 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XKV_B 0.45 0.45 0.45 9 4540 25 0 11 14 11
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
2ZY6_A - 0.58 0.58 0.58 7 691 5 0 5 0 5
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3463 20 2 18 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.59 0.55 0.64 21 4153 12 0 12 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.61 0.57 0.67 20 3210 10 1 9 0 15
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3DW4_A - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 344 2 0 1 1 4
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3HAY_E - 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 2263 8 0 0 8 3
3HJW_D - 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 1637 3 0 1 2 3
3IAB_R - 0.86 0.86 0.86 12 1021 4 1 1 2 2
3ID5_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 491 5 1 4 0 9
3IVN_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 2325 2 1 1 0 12
3IWN_A 0.75 0.67 0.85 22 4252 5 0 4 1 11
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.61 0.53 0.71 10 1211 6 0 4 2 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 0 22 0 32
3KTW_C - 0.39 0.35 0.45 15 4527 19 1 17 1 28
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 2 6 2 6
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3SIU_F - 0.59 0.55 0.67 6 369 3 0 3 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 935
Total TN 126675
Total FP 298
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 241
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 737
Total Scores
MCC 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.775
Nr of predictions 89

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 0.37 0.36 0.40 4 396 6 0 6 0 7
2K63_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 1
2K66_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KEZ_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 5
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KGP_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 296 4 0 4 0 9
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 694 9 0 9 0 16
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_B 0.68 0.56 0.82 14 2128 3 0 3 0 11
2L1F_A 0.66 0.54 0.81 13 2064 3 0 3 0 11
2L2K_A - 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.87 0.76 1.00 26 2459 0 0 0 0 8
2L5Z_A - 0.60 0.50 0.75 6 317 2 0 2 0 6
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2RPT_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 186 4 0 4 0 7
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2WW9_D - 0.19 0.12 0.33 3 1944 6 0 6 0 23
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4533 27 8 19 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.63 0.50 0.80 12 2263 4 0 3 1 12
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
2ZY6_A - 0.58 0.58 0.58 7 691 5 1 4 0 5
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.24 6 3461 19 0 19 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.78 0.95 21 2463 1 0 1 0 6
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3ADB_C - 0.89 0.79 1.00 30 4156 0 0 0 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.67 0.57 0.80 16 2681 5 1 3 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 25 3215 0 0 0 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3DW4_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 0 9 1 24
3HAY_E - 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 2263 3 0 0 3 3
3HJW_D - 0.51 0.50 0.53 9 1636 8 0 8 0 9
3IAB_R - 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 1023 0 0 0 0 2
3ID5_D - 0.44 0.33 0.60 3 491 4 0 2 2 6
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 7 4258 13 1 12 0 26
3J0L_7 - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 10
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.28 0.21 0.40 4 1215 6 1 5 0 15
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3KTW_C - 0.36 0.28 0.48 12 4535 13 3 10 0 31
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 22 2123 0 0 0 0 3
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3549 6 1 5 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.