CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) MCFold
MCC 0.539 > 0.378
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.138 > 0.367 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.389 < 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.751 > 0.373
Total TP 151 < 152
Total TN 60958 > 60751
Total FP 56 < 299
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 27
Total FP INCONS 46 < 229
Total FP COMP 6 < 43
Total FN 237 > 236
P-value 7.84765843136e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 151
Total TN 60958
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 237
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 152
Total TN 60751
Total FP 299
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 229
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 236
Total Scores
MCC 0.378
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.367 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.392
Positive Predictive Value 0.373
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.