CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold Alterna
MCC 0.593 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.188 < 0.636 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.535 = 0.535
Positive Predictive Value 0.668 > 0.654
Total TP 153 = 153
Total TN 20889 > 20884
Total FP 84 < 92
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 12
Total FP INCONS 65 < 69
Total FP COMP 8 < 11
Total FN 133 = 133
P-value 0.000144846895958

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

  2. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 153
Total TN 20889
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.535
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 153
Total TN 20884
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.535
Positive Predictive Value 0.654
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.61 0.53 0.71 10 1211 6 0 4 2 9
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.