CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold MaxExpect
MCC 0.585 > 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.123 > 0.625 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.522 > 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.663 > 0.656
Total TP 343 > 336
Total TN 69824 < 69829
Total FP 196 < 200
Total FP CONTRA 24 > 22
Total FP INCONS 150 < 154
Total FP COMP 22 < 24
Total FN 314 < 321
P-value 3.47427610203e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MaxExpect).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 343
Total TN 69824
Total FP 196
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 314
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 652 0 0 0 0 2
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.65 1.00 28 6077 0 0 0 0 15
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 336
Total TN 69829
Total FP 200
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 154
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 321
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.656
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 6 0 4 2 10
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.65 1.00 28 6077 2 0 0 2 15
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 4 26 11 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.