CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) Alterna
MCC 0.662 > 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.139 > 0.603 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.477 < 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.925 > 0.656
Total TP 173 < 183
Total TN 35577 > 35485
Total FP 22 < 118
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 11
Total FP INCONS 9 < 85
Total FP COMP 8 < 22
Total FN 190 > 180
P-value 2.54914456376e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Alterna).

  2. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Alterna).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Alterna).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Alterna).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Alterna).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Alterna).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 173
Total TN 35577
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.925
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XKV_B 0.32 0.10 1.00 2 4558 1 0 0 1 18
2XQD_Y 0.79 0.63 1.00 17 2833 0 0 0 0 10
3A2K_C 0.78 0.61 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 11
3AMU_B 0.69 0.59 0.80 16 2983 6 0 4 2 11
3GX2_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 13 4358 0 0 0 0 27
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYV_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 16 2833 1 0 1 0 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 183
Total TN 35485
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 180
Total Scores
MCC 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.504
Positive Predictive Value 0.656
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XKV_B 0.45 0.45 0.45 9 4540 25 0 11 14 11
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3IVN_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 2325 2 1 1 0 12
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 0 22 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.