CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Afold
MCC 0.635 > 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.105 > 0.528 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.476 > 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.850 > 0.564
Total TP 351 > 344
Total TN 172013 > 171816
Total FP 90 < 335
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 41
Total FP INCONS 49 < 225
Total FP COMP 28 < 69
Total FN 386 < 393
P-value 3.33194562506e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 351
Total TN 172013
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 386
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.476
Positive Predictive Value 0.850
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XXA_G 0.44 0.19 1.00 8 5143 3 0 0 3 34
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 51 70818 7 3 4 0 81
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 4 0 3 1 21
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.39 0.27 0.56 9 12230 9 0 7 2 24
3JYX_3 0.61 0.56 0.68 15 6306 20 0 7 13 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.70 0.54 0.89 25 6993 5 1 2 2 21
3O58_3 0.54 0.31 0.92 11 12391 1 0 1 0 24
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 9 2 5 2 9
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 344
Total TN 171816
Total FP 335
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 225
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 393
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.528 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.467
Positive Predictive Value 0.564
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.