CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.632 > 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.086 > 0.041 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.464 > 0.021
Positive Predictive Value 0.864 < 1.000
Total TP 412 > 19
Total TN 153918 < 154376
Total FP 100 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 0
Total FP INCONS 57 > 0
Total FP COMP 35 > 0
Total FN 476 < 869
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 412
Total TN 153918
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 476
Total Scores
MCC 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.864
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
2XKV_B 0.46 0.25 0.83 5 4554 6 0 1 5 15
2XXA_G 0.44 0.19 1.00 8 5143 3 0 0 3 34
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 4 0 3 1 21
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3JYX_4 0.39 0.27 0.56 9 12230 9 0 7 2 24
3JYX_3 0.61 0.56 0.68 15 6306 20 0 7 13 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.70 0.54 0.89 25 6993 5 1 2 2 21
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 9 2 5 2 9
3O58_3 0.54 0.31 0.92 11 12391 1 0 1 0 24
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 14180 5 1 4 0 41
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 19
Total TN 154376
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 869
Total Scores
MCC 0.146
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.041 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.021
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4560 0 0 0 0 20
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 42
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 27
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 38
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.