CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.683 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.100 > 0.605 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.533 > 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.880 > 0.709
Total TP 404 > 380
Total TN 106660 > 106583
Total FP 67 < 184
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 18
Total FP INCONS 52 < 138
Total FP COMP 12 < 28
Total FN 354 < 378
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 404
Total TN 106660
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 354
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.880
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.76 0.58 1.00 31 7844 2 0 0 2 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 10 0 10 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3J3V_B 0.66 0.47 0.93 27 6992 2 0 2 0 30
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 380
Total TN 106583
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 138
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 378
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.605 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.