CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.673 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.103 > 0.523 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.518 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.879 > 0.640
Total TP 385 > 325
Total TN 104811 > 104741
Total FP 68 < 207
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 50 < 164
Total FP COMP 15 < 24
Total FN 358 < 418
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 385
Total TN 104811
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 358
Total Scores
MCC 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
2XXA_G 0.44 0.19 1.00 8 5143 3 0 0 3 34
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.76 0.58 1.00 31 7844 2 0 0 2 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 10 0 10 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 325
Total TN 104741
Total FP 207
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 164
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 418
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.640
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5139 12 1 11 0 42
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 0 11 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3F_7 0.43 0.30 0.63 15 7236 9 0 9 0 35
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.