CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Pknots
MCC 0.680 > 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.065 > 0.524 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.529 > 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.879 > 0.539
Total TP 733 > 608
Total TN 215911 > 215617
Total FP 147 < 602
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 65
Total FP INCONS 88 < 455
Total FP COMP 46 < 82
Total FN 653 < 778
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 733
Total TN 215911
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 653
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.659 ± 0.065
Sensitivity 0.529
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XKV_B 0.46 0.25 0.83 5 4554 6 0 1 5 15
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.44 0.19 1.00 8 5143 3 0 0 3 34
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 4 0 3 1 21
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.76 0.58 1.00 31 7844 2 0 0 2 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3E_7 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 10 0 10 0 24
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.66 0.47 0.93 27 6992 2 0 2 0 30
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.39 0.27 0.56 9 12230 9 0 7 2 24
3JYX_3 0.61 0.56 0.68 15 6306 20 0 7 13 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.70 0.54 0.89 25 6993 5 1 2 2 21
3O58_3 0.54 0.31 0.92 11 12391 1 0 1 0 24
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 9 2 5 2 9
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 14180 5 1 4 0 41
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 608
Total TN 215617
Total FP 602
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 455
Total FP COMP 82
Total FN 778
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.524 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.539
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2XKV_B 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4537 31 1 17 13 15
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.32 0.31 0.34 13 5113 25 1 24 0 29
3A2K_C 0.45 0.43 0.48 12 2901 13 2 11 0 16
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.55 16 4342 14 1 12 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.62 0.51 0.75 27 7839 12 0 9 3 26
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.08 2 7479 33 2 20 11 31
3J3E_7 0.43 0.35 0.54 19 7105 16 1 15 0 35
3J3F_8 0.36 0.36 0.37 13 12211 34 2 20 12 23
3J3F_7 0.27 0.24 0.32 12 7222 27 1 25 1 38
3J3V_B 0.41 0.33 0.51 19 6984 18 1 17 0 38
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.18 0.21 0.16 7 12203 41 13 23 5 26
3JYX_3 0.34 0.37 0.31 10 6296 24 9 13 2 17
3LA5_A 0.80 0.65 1.00 22 2463 0 0 0 0 12
3NPB_A 0.76 0.67 0.86 31 6985 8 1 4 3 15
3O58_3 0.27 0.31 0.24 11 12357 38 11 24 3 24
3O58_2 0.83 0.74 0.93 28 7230 3 0 2 1 10
3PDR_A 0.54 0.44 0.65 32 12831 19 0 17 2 40
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.07 0.08 0.07 4 14141 54 4 47 3 48
3ZEX_D 0.27 0.24 0.30 12 6981 28 0 28 0 37
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.48 0.38 0.63 12 3467 7 0 7 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.