CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.656 > 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.119 > 0.490 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.501 > 0.383
Positive Predictive Value 0.864 > 0.567
Total TP 344 > 263
Total TN 110797 > 110731
Total FP 65 < 248
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 21
Total FP INCONS 50 < 180
Total FP COMP 11 < 47
Total FN 343 < 424
P-value 3.05041766982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 344
Total TN 110797
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 343
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.864
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.76 0.58 1.00 31 7844 2 0 0 2 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3E_7 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 10 0 10 0 24
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3J3V_B 0.66 0.47 0.93 27 6992 2 0 2 0 30
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 14180 5 1 4 0 41
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 263
Total TN 110731
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 180
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 424
Total Scores
MCC 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.490 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.383
Positive Predictive Value 0.567
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 30 1 19 10 33
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3F_7 0.18 0.16 0.22 8 7224 28 1 27 0 42
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 12212 35 3 19 13 24
3J3V_B 0.46 0.33 0.63 19 6991 11 0 11 0 38
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 1 17 2 18
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.