CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RNAalifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RNAalifold(seed)
MCC 0.601 > 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.094 > 0.544 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.416 > 0.334
Positive Predictive Value 0.871 < 0.931
Total TP 352 > 283
Total TN 197236 < 197336
Total FP 70 > 31
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 7
Total FP INCONS 43 > 14
Total FP COMP 18 > 10
Total FN 495 < 564
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAalifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAalifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAalifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAalifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAalifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 352
Total TN 197236
Total FP 70
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 495
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.871
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
2XKV_B 0.46 0.25 0.83 5 4554 6 0 1 5 15
2XXA_G 0.44 0.19 1.00 8 5143 3 0 0 3 34
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 51 70818 7 3 4 0 81
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3JYX_4 0.39 0.27 0.56 9 12230 9 0 7 2 24
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.70 0.54 0.89 25 6993 5 1 2 2 21
3O58_3 0.54 0.31 0.92 11 12391 1 0 1 0 24
3PDR_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 45 12832 5 0 3 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 14180 5 1 4 0 41
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 283
Total TN 197336
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 564
Total Scores
MCC 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.544 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.334
Positive Predictive Value 0.931
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2XKV_B 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4553 2 0 0 2 13
2XXA_G 0.46 0.21 1.00 9 5142 0 0 0 0 33
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.61 0.48 0.79 15 2327 4 2 2 0 16
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3LA5_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2466 3 1 2 0 18
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 33 12847 1 0 0 1 39
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.17 1.00 9 14187 0 0 0 0 43
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.