CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Contrafold
MCC 0.624 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.560 ± 0.054 < 0.620 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.443 < 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.880 > 0.658
Total TP 1241 < 1465
Total TN 1514505 > 1513688
Total FP 217 < 871
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 100
Total FP INCONS 147 < 663
Total FP COMP 47 < 108
Total FN 1559 > 1335
P-value 4.48494289621e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1241
Total TN 1514505
Total FP 217
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 1559
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.560 ± 0.054
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.880
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.44 0.42 0.47 8 1111 10 0 9 1 11
2KUR_A 0.77 0.71 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 6
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.44 0.41 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 13
2KUW_A 0.45 0.43 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 12
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.59 10 973 7 0 7 0 10
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.24 0.12 0.50 2 2846 4 0 2 2 15
2WWQ_V 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
2XKV_B 0.53 0.50 0.56 10 4542 20 0 8 12 10
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
2XXA_G 0.77 0.64 0.93 27 5122 3 0 2 1 15
2ZZM_B 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 3480 4 0 4 0 30
2ZZN_D 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2479 0 0 0 0 21
3A2K_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2695 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.52 0.39 0.70 37 60673 21 10 6 5 57
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 51 70818 7 2 5 0 81
3IZF_C 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 6887 0 0 0 0 38
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3J20_2 0.72 0.60 0.86 381 1116321 70 5 58 7 252
3J20_0 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 24
3J20_1 0.51 0.26 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 17
3J2L_3 0.53 0.28 1.00 15 7860 2 0 0 2 38
3J3D_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 22
3J3E_8 0.26 0.09 0.75 3 7499 1 0 1 0 30
3J3E_7 0.56 0.33 0.95 18 7121 1 0 1 0 36
3J3F_8 0.55 0.33 0.92 12 12233 1 0 1 0 24
3J3F_7 0.58 0.34 1.00 17 7243 1 0 0 1 33
3J3V_B 0.48 0.28 0.84 16 7002 3 0 3 0 41
3JYV_7 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 26
3JYX_4 0.52 0.30 0.91 10 12235 3 0 1 2 23
3JYX_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 11 6315 5 0 2 3 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.71 0.54 0.93 25 6994 4 1 1 2 21
3O58_2 0.65 0.42 1.00 16 7244 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_3 0.56 0.34 0.92 12 12390 1 0 1 0 23
3PDR_A 0.77 0.61 0.98 44 12835 3 0 1 2 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3UZL_B 0.40 0.16 1.00 6 3564 0 0 0 0 31
3W1K_J 0.78 0.66 0.93 25 4159 2 1 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.74 0.60 0.92 24 4727 3 0 2 1 16
3ZEX_D 0.60 0.37 1.00 18 7003 0 0 0 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.46 0.23 0.92 12 14183 1 1 0 0 40
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2998 6 0 5 1 23
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15
4FRN_A 0.71 0.56 0.91 20 5129 2 1 1 0 16
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1465
Total TN 1513688
Total FP 871
Total FP CONTRA 100
Total FP INCONS 663
Total FP COMP 108
Total FN 1335
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 4 0 2 2 9
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 25 0 9 16 10
2XQD_Y 0.78 0.70 0.86 19 2828 3 0 3 0 8
2XXA_G 0.13 0.12 0.15 5 5117 29 1 28 0 37
2ZZM_B 0.53 0.47 0.60 15 3461 10 2 8 0 17
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.39 0.41 11 2674 17 4 12 1 17
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.34 0.37 0.32 35 60615 80 21 55 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 60 70777 44 4 35 5 72
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3J20_2 0.58 0.51 0.66 321 1116277 172 10 157 5 312
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 4 0 0 4 2
3J2L_3 0.56 0.49 0.65 26 7835 16 0 14 2 27
3J3D_C 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 2752 6 0 6 0 11
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.10 2 7483 32 1 17 14 31
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3F_8 0.31 0.33 0.29 12 12205 41 4 25 12 24
3J3F_7 0.68 0.62 0.76 31 7219 11 0 10 1 19
3J3V_B 0.48 0.39 0.61 22 6985 14 1 13 0 35
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3JYX_3 0.28 0.30 0.27 8 6298 23 8 14 1 19
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 32 6983 8 1 5 2 14
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 10 2 5 3 9
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3PDR_A 0.69 0.60 0.80 43 12826 13 0 11 2 29
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.67 0.80 33 6980 8 1 7 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.21 0.38 11 14167 22 3 15 4 41
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 25 1 22 2 18
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.68 0.56 0.82 18 3464 4 1 3 0 14
4FRN_A 0.65 0.56 0.77 20 5125 6 1 5 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.