CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.536 > 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.101 > 0.315 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.308 > 0.301
Positive Predictive Value 0.940 > 0.288
Total TP 219 > 214
Total TN 104643 > 104134
Total FP 22 < 566
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 64
Total FP INCONS 14 < 464
Total FP COMP 8 < 38
Total FN 493 < 498
P-value 1.86109605532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 219
Total TN 104643
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 493
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.308
Positive Predictive Value 0.940
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3J20_1 0.51 0.26 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 17
3J2L_3 0.53 0.28 1.00 15 7860 2 0 0 2 38
3J3D_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 22
3J3E_8 0.26 0.09 0.75 3 7499 1 0 1 0 30
3J3E_7 0.56 0.33 0.95 18 7121 1 0 1 0 36
3J3F_8 0.55 0.33 0.92 12 12233 1 0 1 0 24
3J3F_7 0.58 0.34 1.00 17 7243 1 0 0 1 33
3J3V_B 0.48 0.28 0.84 16 7002 3 0 3 0 41
3UZL_B 0.40 0.16 1.00 6 3564 0 0 0 0 31
3W3S_B 0.74 0.60 0.92 24 4727 3 0 2 1 16
3ZEX_D 0.60 0.37 1.00 18 7003 0 0 0 0 31
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2998 6 0 5 1 23
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 104134
Total FP 566
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 464
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 498
Total Scores
MCC 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.315 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.301
Positive Predictive Value 0.288
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3J16_L 0.36 0.37 0.37 11 2745 19 3 16 0 19
3J20_1 0.41 0.48 0.37 11 2896 19 5 14 0 12
3J2L_3 0.11 0.11 0.12 6 7824 46 3 42 1 47
3J3D_C 0.70 0.71 0.69 20 2746 9 2 7 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7466 47 6 31 10 33
3J3E_7 0.35 0.33 0.37 18 7091 31 1 30 0 36
3J3F_8 0.27 0.33 0.22 12 12192 54 9 33 12 24
3J3F_7 0.17 0.18 0.17 9 7208 43 3 40 0 41
3J3V_B 0.24 0.23 0.27 13 6973 35 1 34 0 44
3UZL_B 0.36 0.35 0.38 13 3536 21 3 18 0 24
3W3S_B 0.17 0.18 0.18 7 4713 34 1 32 1 33
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.27 0.27 13 6972 36 1 35 0 36
3ZND_W 0.18 0.22 0.17 5 2973 29 6 19 4 18
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8
4JF2_A 0.51 0.55 0.49 17 2815 18 5 13 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.