CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.639 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.611 ± 0.109 > 0.608 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.476 > 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.862 > 0.787
Total TP 300 > 277
Total TN 102153 > 102149
Total FP 55 < 110
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 8
Total FP INCONS 46 < 67
Total FP COMP 7 < 35
Total FN 330 < 353
P-value 5.02343278931e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 300
Total TN 102153
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 330
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.611 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.476
Positive Predictive Value 0.862
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.44 0.42 0.47 8 1111 10 0 9 1 11
2KUR_A 0.77 0.71 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 6
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.44 0.41 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 13
2KUW_A 0.45 0.43 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 12
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.59 10 973 7 0 7 0 10
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3J3E_8 0.26 0.09 0.75 3 7499 1 0 1 0 30
3J3F_8 0.55 0.33 0.92 12 12233 1 0 1 0 24
3JYX_4 0.52 0.30 0.91 10 12235 3 0 1 2 23
3O58_3 0.56 0.34 0.92 12 12390 1 0 1 0 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.74 0.60 0.92 24 4727 3 0 2 1 16
3ZEX_C 0.46 0.23 0.92 12 14183 1 1 0 0 40
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 277
Total TN 102149
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 353
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2KUU_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 5
2KUV_A 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 5
2KUW_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.