CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.639 > 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.105 > 0.639 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.545 > 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 > 0.663
Total TP 358 > 343
Total TN 69868 > 69824
Total FP 134 < 196
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 24
Total FP INCONS 98 < 150
Total FP COMP 19 < 22
Total FN 299 < 314
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 358
Total TN 69868
Total FP 134
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 98
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 299
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.545
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2YIE_X - 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 1369 3 1 1 1 5
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 5 0 3 2 15
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 343
Total TN 69824
Total FP 196
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 314
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 652 0 0 0 0 2
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.65 1.00 28 6077 0 0 0 0 15
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.