CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.603 > 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.089 > 0.138 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.512 > 0.173
Positive Predictive Value 0.712 < 0.905
Total TP 961 > 325
Total TN 1301810 < 1302801
Total FP 447 > 36
Total FP CONTRA 49 > 3
Total FP INCONS 340 > 31
Total FP COMP 58 > 2
Total FN 915 < 1551
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 961
Total TN 1301810
Total FP 447
Total FP CONTRA 49
Total FP INCONS 340
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 915
Total Scores
MCC 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.712
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 25 0 9 16 10
2XXA_G 0.15 0.12 0.20 5 5126 20 1 19 0 37
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J20_2 0.56 0.48 0.67 303 1116310 158 8 144 6 330
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3JYX_3 0.29 0.30 0.30 8 6301 20 8 11 1 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.70 0.86 32 6984 7 1 4 2 14
3O58_2 0.82 0.76 0.88 29 7227 7 1 3 3 9
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3PDR_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 43 12832 7 0 5 2 29
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 325
Total TN 1302801
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 1551
Total Scores
MCC 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.138 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.173
Positive Predictive Value 0.905
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 19
2KUR_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 7 1121 0 0 0 0 14
2KUU_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 7 1121 0 0 0 0 14
2KUV_A 0.64 0.41 1.00 9 1119 0 0 0 0 13
2KUW_A 0.65 0.43 1.00 9 1119 0 0 0 0 12
2L1F_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 25
2L1F_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2080 0 0 0 0 24
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4560 0 0 0 0 20
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 42
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3655 0 0 0 0 37
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 54
3J20_2 0.59 0.40 0.88 251 1116480 36 3 31 2 382
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 38
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.