CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.508 > 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.084 > 0.567 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.422 > 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.617 > 0.607
Total TP 772 > 723
Total TN 338274 < 338334
Total FP 527 < 533
Total FP CONTRA 46 < 51
Total FP INCONS 433 > 417
Total FP COMP 48 < 65
Total FN 1058 < 1107
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 772
Total TN 338274
Total FP 527
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 433
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 1058
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.581 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.617
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1162 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 1 0 1 0 1
2M58_A - 0.09 0.06 0.14 1 1646 6 0 6 0 16
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 5 0 3 2 15
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.65 0.89 41 10250 6 0 5 1 22
3J2C_M - 0.40 0.29 0.57 59 106387 47 5 40 2 148
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3V_B 0.47 0.37 0.60 21 6986 14 1 13 0 36
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9011 27 4 23 0 31
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21895 52 3 47 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.28 0.46 21 16425 29 2 23 4 53
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.15 0.13 0.22 2 586 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 723
Total TN 338334
Total FP 533
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 417
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 1107
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.567 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.395
Positive Predictive Value 0.607
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1162 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2M58_A - 0.32 0.24 0.44 4 1644 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.70 0.49 1.00 21 6084 0 0 0 0 22
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_O - 0.62 0.49 0.78 31 10256 10 0 9 1 32
3J2C_M - 0.38 0.29 0.50 60 106370 64 11 50 3 147
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 30 1 19 10 33
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 12212 35 3 19 13 24
3J3F_7 0.18 0.16 0.22 8 7224 28 1 27 0 42
3J3V_B 0.46 0.33 0.63 19 6991 11 0 11 0 38
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W1K_J 0.84 0.74 0.97 28 4157 1 1 0 0 10
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9012 26 4 22 0 31
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2628 0 0 0 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 4 49 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16471 0 0 0 0 74
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 1 17 2 18
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 584 11 0 11 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 1524 0 0 0 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.