CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.647 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.681 ± 0.141 > 0.608 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.556 > 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.758 < 0.787
Total TP 350 > 277
Total TN 102039 < 102149
Total FP 138 > 110
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 8
Total FP INCONS 93 > 67
Total FP COMP 26 < 35
Total FN 280 < 353
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 350
Total TN 102039
Total FP 138
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 280
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.681 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.556
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 277
Total TN 102149
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 353
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.440
Positive Predictive Value 0.787
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2KUU_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 5
2KUV_A 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 5
2KUW_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.