CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	CentroidHomfold‑LAST		Fold
MCC	0.587	>	0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.662 ± 0.083	>	0.631 ± 0.091
Sensitivity	0.439	<	0.473
Positive Predictive Value	0.789	>	0.615
Total TP	677	<	729
Total TN	271688	>	271361
Total FP	213	<	500
Total FP CONTRA	16	<	43
Total FP INCONS	165	<	413
Total FP COMP	32	<	44
Total FN	865	>	813
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Fold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Fold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Fold).

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	677
Total TN	271688
Total FP	213
Total FP CONTRA	16
Total FP INCONS	165
Total FP COMP	32
Total FN	865

Total Scores
MCC	0.587
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.662 ± 0.083
Sensitivity	0.439
Positive Predictive Value	0.789
Nr of predictions	56

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	0	11	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	8	457	0	0	0	0	7
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	6101	4	0	4	0	39
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.20	0.04	1.00	1	2277	0	0	0	0	23
2YIE_Z	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	8	1532	0	0	0	0	4
2YIE_X	-	0.76	0.58	1.00	7	1371	0	0	0	0	5
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.95	19	2983	3	0	1	2	8
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_h	-	0.76	0.63	0.93	27	6076	4	0	2	2	16
3J0L_7	-	0.60	0.41	0.88	7	1217	1	0	1	0	10
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	465	0	0	0	0	4
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1125	3	0	3	0	16
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.24	1.00	8	6208	0	0	0	0	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.37	0.34	11	2818	22	3	18	1	19
3J2C_O	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	10296	0	0	0	0	63
3J2C_M	-	0.37	0.16	0.83	34	106450	8	0	7	1	173
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.62	0.87	33	7837	7	0	5	2	20
3NMU_E	-	0.41	0.17	1.00	1	560	3	0	0	3	5
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.53	1.00	18	2193	0	0	0	0	16
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.45	0.90	19	3895	2	0	2	0	23
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.58	0.43	0.80	16	3140	4	0	4	0	21
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	29	4724	1	0	0	1	11
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21914	33	1	30	2	77
3ZEX_G	-	0.75	0.61	0.92	45	16422	7	0	4	3	29
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.65	0.86	32	6984	5	0	5	0	17
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.15	0.18	5	11753	29	5	18	6	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	7104	6	0	6	0	24
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	21	4350	1	0	0	1	21
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.41	0.43	13	3456	17	3	14	0	19
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.39	0.34	14	5110	27	3	24	0	22
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	729
Total TN	271361
Total FP	500
Total FP CONTRA	43
Total FP INCONS	413
Total FP COMP	44
Total FN	813

Total Scores
MCC	0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.631 ± 0.091
Sensitivity	0.473
Positive Predictive Value	0.615
Nr of predictions	56

^top

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.39	0.26	0.63	5	622	3	1	2	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	2	13	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.85	0.79	0.91	31	6071	5	0	3	2	8
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	484	0	0	0	0	1
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.65	0.63	0.68	15	2256	8	1	6	1	9
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	3	12	0	12
2YIE_X	-	0.25	0.25	0.27	3	1367	8	2	6	0	9
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.59	0.70	16	2980	9	0	7	2	11
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_1	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	12	1212	2	0	1	1	7
3J0L_h	-	0.81	0.65	1.00	28	6077	2	0	0	2	15
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1213	12	0	12	0	17
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_a	-	0.20	0.19	0.23	3	1115	10	2	8	0	13
3J0L_2	-	0.25	0.24	0.26	8	6185	25	2	21	2	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.53	0.76	16	2754	5	0	5	0	14
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.40	0.52	12	2827	12	0	11	1	18
3J2C_O	-	0.59	0.54	0.65	34	10244	18	1	17	0	29
3J2C_M	-	0.19	0.15	0.23	32	106350	110	5	104	1	175
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.53	0.74	28	7837	12	0	10	2	25
3NMU_E	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	552	11	2	7	2	6
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.48	0.69	20	3887	9	1	8	0	22
3SIU_F	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	8	370	0	0	0	0	3
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	394	0	0	0	0	0
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.45	0.35	0.59	13	3138	9	1	8	0	24
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.62	0.96	23	3546	1	0	1	0	14
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.75	0.97	30	4722	2	0	1	1	10
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21890	57	2	53	2	77
3ZEX_G	-	0.76	0.65	0.89	48	16417	12	0	6	6	26
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.67	0.87	33	6983	5	1	4	0	16
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.14	0.15	0.14	5	11744	43	5	27	11	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.57	0.82	31	7102	7	1	6	0	23
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.40	0.63	17	4344	11	2	8	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.26	0.42	5	1263	7	1	6	0	14
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.31	0.26	0.38	5	1313	8	1	7	0	14
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.22	0.27	7	3460	19	3	16	0	25
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.36	0.46	13	5123	15	2	13	0	23
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]