CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST MCFold
MCC 0.622 > 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.079 > 0.541 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.510 > 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.765 > 0.479
Total TP 695 > 669
Total TN 164431 > 163944
Total FP 257 < 861
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 79
Total FP INCONS 193 < 648
Total FP COMP 43 < 134
Total FN 669 < 695
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 695
Total TN 164431
Total FP 257
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 193
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 669
Total Scores
MCC 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.765
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1162 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1648 5 0 5 0 17
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.20 0.04 1.00 1 2277 0 0 0 0 23
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.76 0.63 0.93 27 6076 4 0 2 2 16
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.61 0.92 45 16422 7 0 4 3 29
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.75 0.57 1.00 13 1527 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 669
Total TN 163944
Total FP 861
Total FP CONTRA 79
Total FP INCONS 648
Total FP COMP 134
Total FN 695
Total Scores
MCC 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 19
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LDT_A - 0.75 0.73 0.79 11 451 3 0 3 0 4
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1160 5 0 0 5 0
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 2 0 1 1 1
2M58_A - 0.20 0.24 0.18 4 1631 19 2 16 1 13
2RRC_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 2 0 0 2 0
2Y9C_V - 0.62 0.67 0.59 16 2251 13 2 9 2 8
2YIE_Z - 0.36 0.50 0.27 6 1518 18 4 12 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.06 0.08 0.06 1 1361 21 1 15 5 11
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 182 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_h - 0.91 0.91 0.91 39 6062 13 0 4 9 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 2 553 12 0 6 6 4
3R9X_C - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 585 7 0 3 4 3
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3SIU_F - 0.42 0.45 0.42 5 366 7 1 6 0 6
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 201 9 0 9 0 6
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 268 9 0 8 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16456 15 1 14 0 74
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21
4FRN_A 0.12 0.14 0.12 5 5110 38 1 35 2 31
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 4 0 0 4 0
4JF2_A 0.66 0.68 0.66 21 2818 11 0 11 0 10
4JRC_A - 0.20 0.22 0.21 5 1516 19 0 19 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.