CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Murlet(20)
MCC 0.645 > 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.127 > 0.572 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.549 > 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.764 < 0.774
Total TP 262 > 216
Total TN 59828 < 59892
Total FP 93 > 71
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 4
Total FP INCONS 70 > 59
Total FP COMP 12 > 8
Total FN 215 < 261
P-value 1.42300079339e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 59828
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 215
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.549
Positive Predictive Value 0.764
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 216
Total TN 59892
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 261
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.774
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.59 10 973 7 0 7 0 10
3AMU_B 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2983 3 0 2 1 9
3J20_1 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2910 3 0 3 0 10
3J20_0 0.58 0.47 0.74 14 2831 5 0 5 0 16
3J2L_3 0.69 0.49 0.96 26 7848 3 0 1 2 27
3RKF_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2195 0 0 0 0 18
3SD1_A 0.68 0.57 0.83 24 3887 5 1 4 0 18
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
4A1C_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 22 7114 4 0 4 0 32
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.20 5 11756 24 2 18 4 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 23 4347 2 0 1 1 19
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 4 3470 12 1 11 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.