CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.556 > 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.201 > 0.443 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.472 > 0.267
Positive Predictive Value 0.663 < 0.738
Total TP 159 > 90
Total TN 40560 < 40678
Total FP 89 > 33
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 2
Total FP INCONS 70 > 30
Total FP COMP 8 > 1
Total FN 178 < 247
P-value 1.49381627234e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 40560
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 40678
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 247
Total Scores
MCC 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.443 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.267
Positive Predictive Value 0.738
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.