CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Pknots
MCC 0.661 > 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.693 ± 0.079 > 0.658 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.538 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.652
Total TP 643 > 605
Total TN 133028 > 132886
Total FP 172 < 365
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 29
Total FP INCONS 128 < 294
Total FP COMP 29 < 42
Total FN 552 < 590
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Pknots).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 643
Total TN 133028
Total FP 172
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 128
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 552
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.693 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.538
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.20 0.04 1.00 1 2277 0 0 0 0 23
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_h - 0.76 0.63 0.93 27 6076 4 0 2 2 16
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.61 0.92 45 16422 7 0 4 3 29
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 605
Total TN 132886
Total FP 365
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 294
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 590
Total Scores
MCC 0.571
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.44 0.44 0.45 17 6067 22 4 17 1 22
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.33 0.23 0.50 3 490 3 0 3 0 10
2RRC_A - 0.77 0.60 1.00 6 225 0 0 0 0 4
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.50 0.71 12 2261 6 1 4 1 12
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 2 0 0 2 7
3J0L_h - 0.58 0.49 0.70 21 6075 11 0 9 2 22
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 2 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.36 0.36 12 6183 23 3 18 2 21
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.62 0.51 0.75 27 7839 12 0 9 3 26
3NMU_E - 0.54 0.50 0.60 3 556 5 0 2 3 3
3R9X_C - 0.73 0.70 0.78 7 586 5 0 2 3 3
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.26 0.22 0.32 8 3135 17 0 17 0 29
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.71 0.63 0.81 25 4722 7 0 6 1 15
3ZEX_D 0.27 0.24 0.30 12 6981 28 0 28 0 37
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.32 0.41 24 16413 37 3 31 3 50
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.48 0.38 0.63 12 3467 7 0 7 0 20
4FRN_A 0.51 0.42 0.63 15 5127 9 1 8 0 21
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.