CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.600 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.113 > 0.518 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.512 > 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.705
Total TP 359 > 292
Total TN 99591 < 99684
Total FP 176 > 142
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 15
Total FP INCONS 131 > 107
Total FP COMP 28 > 20
Total FN 342 < 409
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 359
Total TN 99591
Total FP 176
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 131
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 342
Total Scores
MCC 0.600
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 292
Total TN 99684
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 107
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 409
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.518 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.417
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 974 6 0 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.61 0.41 0.92 11 2991 1 0 1 0 16
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_1 0.66 0.48 0.92 11 2914 1 0 1 0 12
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.