CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Vsfold4
MCC 0.624 > 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.673 ± 0.085 > 0.619 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.484 > 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.811 > 0.626
Total TP 629 > 558
Total TN 160128 > 160013
Total FP 178 < 366
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 26
Total FP INCONS 134 < 307
Total FP COMP 31 < 33
Total FN 670 < 741
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 629
Total TN 160128
Total FP 178
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 670
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.673 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.811
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.20 0.04 1.00 1 2277 0 0 0 0 23
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.76 0.63 0.93 27 6076 4 0 2 2 16
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10296 0 0 0 0 63
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.61 0.92 45 16422 7 0 4 3 29
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21914 33 1 30 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 558
Total TN 160013
Total FP 366
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 307
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 741
Total Scores
MCC 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.626
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.28 0.34 11 6073 21 3 18 0 28
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.63 0.50 0.80 12 2263 4 0 3 1 12
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.28 0.21 0.40 4 1215 6 1 5 0 15
3J0L_h - 0.38 0.28 0.52 12 6082 11 0 11 0 31
3J0L_7 - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.38 0.36 0.41 12 6187 18 3 14 1 21
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.30 0.24 0.39 15 10258 24 0 23 1 48
3J2L_3 0.57 0.45 0.73 24 7842 12 1 8 3 29
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3549 6 1 5 0 22
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.67 0.58 0.79 23 4724 7 0 6 1 17
3ZEX_G - 0.30 0.23 0.39 17 16427 27 2 25 0 57
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.11 5 21900 40 1 39 0 72
3ZEX_D 0.55 0.45 0.69 22 6989 10 0 10 0 27
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.