CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Alterna
MCC 0.690 > 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.193 > 0.664 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.587 > 0.537
Positive Predictive Value 0.819 > 0.684
Total TP 118 > 108
Total TN 13746 > 13732
Total FP 27 < 56
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 8
Total FP INCONS 25 < 42
Total FP COMP 1 < 6
Total FN 83 < 93
P-value 2.32677072069e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Alterna).

  2. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Alterna).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 13746
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 13732
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.537
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.61 0.53 0.71 10 1211 6 0 4 2 9
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.