CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CentroidFold
MCC 0.566 > 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.081 > 0.575 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.469 > 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.684 > 0.591
Total TP 1417 > 1162
Total TN 2526599 < 2526705
Total FP 729 < 863
Total FP CONTRA 68 > 63
Total FP INCONS 586 < 740
Total FP COMP 75 > 60
Total FN 1604 < 1859
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1417
Total TN 2526599
Total FP 729
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 586
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 1604
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1160 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1639 14 0 14 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3J3V_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 33 6988 0 0 0 0 24
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W1K_J 0.81 0.71 0.93 27 4157 2 1 1 0 11
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_B - 0.19 0.15 0.23 86 1072008 291 21 265 5 472
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19
4JRC_A - 0.78 0.61 1.00 14 1526 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1162
Total TN 2526705
Total FP 863
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 740
Total FP COMP 60
Total FN 1859
Total Scores
MCC 0.476
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.591
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1162 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 1 0 1 0 1
2M58_A - 0.09 0.06 0.14 1 1646 6 0 6 0 16
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 5 0 3 2 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_2 0.56 0.48 0.67 303 1116310 158 8 144 6 330
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2C_M - 0.40 0.29 0.57 59 106387 47 5 40 2 148
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.65 0.89 41 10250 6 0 5 1 22
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3V_B 0.47 0.37 0.60 21 6986 14 1 13 0 36
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9011 27 4 23 0 31
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.16 0.34 87 1072121 178 9 163 6 471
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21895 52 3 47 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.28 0.46 21 16425 29 2 23 4 53
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.15 0.13 0.22 2 586 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.