CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MCFold
MCC 0.603 > 0.450
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.643 ± 0.093 > 0.517 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.724 > 0.448
Total TP 631 > 573
Total TN 173095 > 172688
Total FP 301 < 832
Total FP CONTRA 30 < 89
Total FP INCONS 210 < 616
Total FP COMP 61 < 127
Total FN 615 < 673
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 631
Total TN 173095
Total FP 301
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 210
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 615
Total Scores
MCC 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.643 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1160 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1639 14 0 14 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19
4JRC_A - 0.78 0.61 1.00 14 1526 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 573
Total TN 172688
Total FP 832
Total FP CONTRA 89
Total FP INCONS 616
Total FP COMP 127
Total FN 673
Total Scores
MCC 0.450
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.448
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1160 5 0 0 5 0
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 2 0 1 1 1
2M58_A - 0.20 0.24 0.18 4 1631 19 2 16 1 13
3J0L_h - 0.91 0.91 0.91 39 6062 13 0 4 9 4
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 182 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 201 9 0 9 0 6
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 268 9 0 8 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3ZEX_H - 0.14 0.18 0.12 7 8987 52 14 37 1 31
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2610 29 4 14 11 12
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14156 29 3 26 0 41
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16456 15 1 14 0 74
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 8 0 6 2 7
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13
4FNJ_A - 0.83 0.81 0.87 13 580 3 0 2 1 3
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21
4FRN_A 0.12 0.14 0.12 5 5110 38 1 35 2 31
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 4 0 0 4 0
4JF2_A 0.66 0.68 0.66 21 2818 11 0 11 0 10
4JRC_A - 0.20 0.22 0.21 5 1516 19 0 19 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.