CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.696 > 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.101 > 0.584 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.572 > 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.847 > 0.769
Total TP 687 > 644
Total TN 1197990 > 1197964
Total FP 151 < 229
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 26
Total FP INCONS 109 < 167
Total FP COMP 27 < 36
Total FN 515 < 558
P-value 3.18846395401e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 687
Total TN 1197990
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 109
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 515
Total Scores
MCC 0.696
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.572
Positive Predictive Value 0.847
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 644
Total TN 1197964
Total FP 229
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 167
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 558
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.536
Positive Predictive Value 0.769
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 3
3J20_2 0.67 0.58 0.77 366 1116289 118 14 96 8 267
3J20_0 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 11
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 1 8 2 27
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
3W3S_B 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 4723 6 0 6 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 20 2 7 11 42
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.69 0.83 34 6980 7 1 6 0 15
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.41 0.31 0.56 10 3468 8 2 6 0 22
4FRN_A 0.62 0.53 0.73 19 5125 7 2 5 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.