CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold McQFold
MCC 0.560 > 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.090 > 0.575 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.463 > 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.679 > 0.462
Total TP 1204 > 866
Total TN 2468047 > 2467945
Total FP 624 < 1053
Total FP CONTRA 53 < 84
Total FP INCONS 517 < 926
Total FP COMP 54 > 43
Total FN 1395 < 1733
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and McQFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1204
Total TN 2468047
Total FP 624
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 517
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 1395
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.679
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_B - 0.19 0.15 0.23 86 1072008 291 21 265 5 472
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 866
Total TN 2467945
Total FP 1053
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 926
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 1733
Total Scores
MCC 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.462
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 2 0 1 1 3
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.26 0.24 0.30 8 6189 21 0 19 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.65 0.49 0.88 21 6081 3 0 3 0 22
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_2 0.46 0.39 0.54 249 1116304 216 8 204 4 384
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2C_O - 0.53 0.43 0.66 27 10255 15 1 13 1 36
3J2C_M - 0.31 0.25 0.38 51 106357 86 12 71 3 156
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4725 14 0 13 1 25
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.31 0.27 0.36 20 16416 38 1 34 3 54
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.53 0.90 26 6992 3 1 2 0 23
3ZEX_B - 0.11 0.09 0.13 53 1071960 373 32 335 6 505
3ZEX_H - 0.21 0.21 0.22 8 9009 29 6 22 1 30
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.21 0.34 11 14164 24 2 19 3 41
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 523 5 0 5 0 10
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 588 7 0 7 0 16
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 20 5130 1 1 0 0 16
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.