CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.706 > 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.149 > 0.541 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.565 > 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.885 > 0.663
Total TP 200 > 167
Total TN 49825 > 49799
Total FP 43 < 93
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 8
Total FP INCONS 23 < 77
Total FP COMP 17 > 8
Total FN 154 < 187
P-value 1.12262428713e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 200
Total TN 49825
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.706
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.565
Positive Predictive Value 0.885
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 167
Total TN 49799
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 77
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 187
Total Scores
MCC 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.