CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.522 > 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.149 > 0.405 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.413 > 0.225
Positive Predictive Value 0.665 < 0.717
Total TP 121 > 66
Total TN 47697 < 47787
Total FP 82 > 27
Total FP CONTRA 7 > 1
Total FP INCONS 54 > 25
Total FP COMP 21 > 1
Total FN 172 < 227
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 47697
Total FP 82
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.665
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 47787
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 227
Total Scores
MCC 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.405 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.225
Positive Predictive Value 0.717
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.