CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold ProbKnot
MCC 0.563 > 0.472
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.089 > 0.609 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.466 > 0.414
Positive Predictive Value 0.681 > 0.539
Total TP 1218 > 1083
Total TN 2468529 > 2468307
Total FP 624 < 993
Total FP CONTRA 53 < 93
Total FP INCONS 517 < 834
Total FP COMP 54 < 66
Total FN 1397 < 1532
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1218
Total TN 2468529
Total FP 624
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 517
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 1397
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.681
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_B - 0.19 0.15 0.23 86 1072008 291 21 265 5 472
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1083
Total TN 2468307
Total FP 993
Total FP CONTRA 93
Total FP INCONS 834
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 1532
Total Scores
MCC 0.472
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.414
Positive Predictive Value 0.539
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 3 0 3 0 15
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J0L_2 - 0.27 0.27 0.28 9 6184 26 2 21 3 24
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_2 0.50 0.43 0.57 272 1116290 208 11 192 5 361
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.52 0.70 33 10249 15 0 14 1 30
3J2C_M - 0.37 0.30 0.45 63 106352 79 9 67 3 144
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2620 11 2 6 3 12
3ZEX_G - 0.77 0.66 0.91 49 16417 10 0 5 5 25
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21886 61 2 57 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.33 146 1071940 307 34 260 13 412
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.19 7 9009 29 4 25 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FNJ_A - 0.66 0.50 0.89 8 586 1 0 1 0 8
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22
4FRN_A 0.44 0.36 0.54 13 5127 11 2 9 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.