CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.633 > 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.091 > 0.580 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.523 > 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.769 > 0.614
Total TP 745 > 559
Total TN 280203 < 280261
Total FP 270 < 392
Total FP CONTRA 24 < 43
Total FP INCONS 200 < 309
Total FP COMP 46 > 40
Total FN 679 < 865
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 745
Total TN 280203
Total FP 270
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 200
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 679
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.769
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 559
Total TN 280261
Total FP 392
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 309
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 865
Total Scores
MCC 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.614
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.70 0.49 1.00 21 6084 0 0 0 0 22
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2C_M - 0.38 0.29 0.50 60 106370 64 11 50 3 147
3J2C_O - 0.62 0.49 0.78 31 10256 10 0 9 1 32
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2628 0 0 0 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16471 0 0 0 0 74
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 4 49 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9012 26 4 22 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 584 11 0 11 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.