CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	ContextFold		RNAfold
MCC	0.563	>	0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.666 ± 0.089	>	0.611 ± 0.092
Sensitivity	0.466	>	0.413
Positive Predictive Value	0.681	>	0.535
Total TP	1218	>	1081
Total TN	2468529	>	2468296
Total FP	624	<	1010
Total FP CONTRA	53	<	89
Total FP INCONS	517	<	851
Total FP COMP	54	<	70
Total FN	1397	<	1534
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAfold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAfold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAfold).

^top

Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	1218
Total TN	2468529
Total FP	624
Total FP CONTRA	53
Total FP INCONS	517
Total FP COMP	54
Total FN	1397

Total Scores
MCC	0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.666 ± 0.089
Sensitivity	0.466
Positive Predictive Value	0.681
Nr of predictions	49

^top

2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.50	0.63	10	1524	6	0	6	0	10
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	0	0	0	0	2
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LJJ_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	344	2	0	0	2	1
2LK3_A	-	0.89	0.80	1.00	8	268	0	0	0	0	2
2LKR_A	-	0.65	0.56	0.76	22	6076	9	0	7	2	17
2LQZ_A	-	0.80	0.73	0.89	8	342	1	1	0	0	3
2LWK_A	-	0.88	0.85	0.92	11	484	1	0	1	0	2
3J0L_h	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	29	6076	2	0	0	2	14
3J0L_1	-	0.70	0.58	0.85	11	1212	3	0	2	1	8
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	462	3	1	2	0	4
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1212	13	0	13	0	17
3J0L_a	-	0.71	0.56	0.90	9	1118	1	0	1	0	7
3J0L_2	-	0.64	0.61	0.69	20	6187	11	2	7	2	13
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.70	1.00	21	2829	1	0	0	1	9
3J20_2	SSU_rRNA_archaea links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.61	0.87	387	1116318	63	8	52	3	246
3J2C_O	-	0.83	0.70	1.00	44	10252	1	0	0	1	19
3J2C_M	-	0.72	0.57	0.92	118	106363	13	2	8	3	89
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.62	1.00	33	7842	2	0	0	2	20
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	0	0	0	0	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	0	0	0	0	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	21	3139	0	0	0	0	16
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.70	0.90	28	4722	4	0	3	1	12
3ZEX_F	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	2617	16	2	9	5	12
3ZEX_G	-	0.26	0.20	0.33	15	16426	34	2	28	4	59
3ZEX_E	-	0.08	0.06	0.10	5	21896	44	5	39	0	72
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.67	0.97	33	6987	1	0	1	0	16
3ZEX_B	-	0.19	0.15	0.23	86	1072008	291	21	265	5	472
3ZEX_H	-	0.22	0.21	0.24	8	9011	26	2	24	0	30
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.33	0.25	0.45	13	14167	22	1	15	6	39
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.15	0.28	5	11763	26	0	13	13	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.63	0.97	34	7105	1	0	1	0	20
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.40	0.68	17	4346	9	1	7	1	25
4ATO_G	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	526	2	0	2	0	10
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.47	1.00	9	1266	0	0	0	0	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FNJ_A	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	10	585	0	0	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.56	0.90	18	3466	2	1	1	0	14
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.33	0.50	12	5127	12	3	9	0	24
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	1081
Total TN	2468296
Total FP	1010
Total FP CONTRA	89
Total FP INCONS	851
Total FP COMP	70
Total FN	1534

Total Scores
MCC	0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.611 ± 0.092
Sensitivity	0.413
Positive Predictive Value	0.535
Nr of predictions	49

^top

2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.93	0.87	1.00	34	6071	3	0	0	3	5
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
3J0L_h	-	0.75	0.60	0.93	26	6077	4	0	2	2	17
3J0L_1	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	12	1212	2	0	1	1	7
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	460	5	1	4	0	4
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1213	12	0	12	0	17
3J0L_a	-	0.23	0.19	0.30	3	1118	7	1	6	0	13
3J0L_2	-	0.25	0.24	0.26	8	6185	25	2	21	2	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	2	0	0	2	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.40	0.48	12	2825	14	0	13	1	18
3J20_2	SSU_rRNA_archaea links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.41	0.53	258	1116279	231	14	214	3	375
3J2C_O	-	0.64	0.54	0.76	34	10251	12	0	11	1	29
3J2C_M	-	0.51	0.41	0.63	85	106355	54	8	43	3	122
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.53	0.74	28	7837	12	0	10	2	25
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.38	0.61	14	3547	9	0	9	0	23
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.50	0.61	20	4720	14	1	12	1	20
3ZEX_F	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	2617	11	2	9	0	12
3ZEX_G	-	0.66	0.57	0.76	42	16416	18	0	13	5	32
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21893	54	4	48	2	77
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.65	0.91	32	6986	3	0	3	0	17
3ZEX_B	-	0.30	0.27	0.33	151	1071922	318	35	272	11	407
3ZEX_H	-	0.18	0.18	0.18	7	9006	32	6	26	0	31
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.21	0.28	11	14157	42	1	27	14	41
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.14	0.15	0.14	5	11744	43	5	27	11	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.82	32	7101	7	1	6	0	22
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.40	0.63	17	4344	11	2	8	1	25
4ATO_G	-	0.32	0.30	0.38	3	520	5	1	4	0	7
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.58	0.85	11	1262	2	1	1	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.26	0.42	5	1314	7	1	6	0	14
4FNJ_A	-	0.79	0.63	1.00	10	585	0	0	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.28	0.38	9	3462	15	0	15	0	23
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.44	0.62	16	5125	10	2	8	0	20
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]