CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNAsubopt
MCC 0.633 > 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.091 > 0.600 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.523 > 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.769 > 0.582
Total TP 745 > 644
Total TN 280203 > 280065
Total FP 270 < 517
Total FP CONTRA 24 < 45
Total FP INCONS 200 < 418
Total FP COMP 46 < 54
Total FN 679 < 780
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 745
Total TN 280203
Total FP 270
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 200
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 679
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.769
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 644
Total TN 280065
Total FP 517
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 418
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 780
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.600 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.582
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.77 0.86 30 6070 9 0 5 4 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.75 0.60 0.93 26 6077 4 0 2 2 17
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 25 0 21 4 25
3J16_L 0.41 0.37 0.48 11 2752 12 1 11 0 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 2 0 0 2 2
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2C_M - 0.44 0.37 0.52 76 106346 72 8 61 3 131
3J2C_O - 0.56 0.49 0.65 31 10248 17 1 16 0 32
3J2L_3 0.61 0.53 0.72 28 7836 13 0 11 2 25
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.46 0.42 0.52 31 16411 32 3 26 3 43
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.51 0.44 0.59 16 5124 11 3 8 0 20
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.