CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.566 > 0.343
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.081 > 0.470 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.469 > 0.318
Positive Predictive Value 0.684 > 0.371
Total TP 1417 > 962
Total TN 2526599 > 2526076
Total FP 729 < 1721
Total FP CONTRA 68 < 187
Total FP INCONS 586 < 1445
Total FP COMP 75 < 89
Total FN 1604 < 2059
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1417
Total TN 2526599
Total FP 729
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 586
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 1604
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LU0_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1160 0 0 0 0 0
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1639 14 0 14 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3J3V_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 33 6988 0 0 0 0 24
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W1K_J 0.81 0.71 0.93 27 4157 2 1 1 0 11
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_B - 0.19 0.15 0.23 86 1072008 291 21 265 5 472
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19
4JRC_A - 0.78 0.61 1.00 14 1526 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 962
Total TN 2526076
Total FP 1721
Total FP CONTRA 187
Total FP INCONS 1445
Total FP COMP 89
Total FN 2059
Total Scores
MCC 0.343
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.470 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.318
Positive Predictive Value 0.371
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 4
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 1161 3 0 0 3 1
2LWK_A - 0.37 0.38 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 8
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.63 0.75 12 1209 5 0 4 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.33 0.30 0.37 13 6070 24 0 22 2 30
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.17 0.21 35 106323 133 11 122 0 172
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 270 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_B - 0.14 0.13 0.15 70 1071902 417 55 353 9 488
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 2 0 0 2 0
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.