CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.605 > 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.142 > 0.471 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.492 > 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.749 > 0.653
Total TP 310 > 235
Total TN 103760 < 103814
Total FP 148 > 145
Total FP CONTRA 16 = 16
Total FP INCONS 88 < 109
Total FP COMP 44 > 20
Total FN 320 < 395
P-value 3.13260312532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 310
Total TN 103760
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 320
Total Scores
MCC 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 235
Total TN 103814
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 109
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 395
Total Scores
MCC 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.471 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.653
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.66 0.48 0.92 11 2914 1 0 1 0 12
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.19 0.36 10 14168 18 2 16 0 42
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.