CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold UNAFold
MCC 0.563 > 0.469
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.089 > 0.597 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.466 > 0.412
Positive Predictive Value 0.681 > 0.534
Total TP 1218 > 1078
Total TN 2468529 > 2468300
Total FP 624 < 1007
Total FP CONTRA 53 < 92
Total FP INCONS 517 < 847
Total FP COMP 54 < 68
Total FN 1397 < 1537
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1218
Total TN 2468529
Total FP 624
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 517
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 1397
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.681
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LQZ_A - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 342 1 1 0 0 3
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2C_M - 0.72 0.57 0.92 118 106363 13 2 8 3 89
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 16 2 9 5 12
3ZEX_G - 0.26 0.20 0.33 15 16426 34 2 28 4 59
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_B - 0.19 0.15 0.23 86 1072008 291 21 265 5 472
3ZEX_H - 0.22 0.21 0.24 8 9011 26 2 24 0 30
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1078
Total TN 2468300
Total FP 1007
Total FP CONTRA 92
Total FP INCONS 847
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 1537
Total Scores
MCC 0.469
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.412
Positive Predictive Value 0.534
Nr of predictions 49

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 1 0 0 1 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_h - 0.75 0.60 0.93 26 6077 4 0 2 2 17
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 2 0 2 0 8
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - 0.48 0.41 0.58 7 1213 5 0 5 0 10
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J16_L 0.26 0.23 0.30 7 2752 16 1 15 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 5 0 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_2 0.47 0.41 0.53 260 1116278 230 15 212 3 373
3J2C_O - 0.52 0.44 0.61 28 10250 19 0 18 1 35
3J2C_M - 0.56 0.46 0.69 96 106351 49 7 37 5 111
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.75 0.64 0.89 47 16418 12 0 6 6 27
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_B - 0.31 0.28 0.35 154 1071936 301 33 257 11 404
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.43 0.36 0.52 13 5126 12 2 10 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.