CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	ContextFold		Vsfold4
MCC	0.660	>	0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.713 ± 0.093	>	0.614 ± 0.097
Sensitivity	0.549	>	0.418
Positive Predictive Value	0.797	>	0.606
Total TP	584	>	444
Total TN	142333	=	142333
Total FP	181	<	314
Total FP CONTRA	14	<	21
Total FP INCONS	135	<	268
Total FP COMP	32	>	25
Total FN	479	<	619
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold4).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold4).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold4).

^top

Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	584
Total TN	142333
Total FP	181
Total FP CONTRA	14
Total FP INCONS	135
Total FP COMP	32
Total FN	479

Total Scores
MCC	0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.713 ± 0.093
Sensitivity	0.549
Positive Predictive Value	0.797
Nr of predictions	41

^top

2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.50	0.63	10	1524	6	0	6	0	10
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	0	0	0	0	2
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LJJ_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	344	2	0	0	2	1
2LK3_A	-	0.89	0.80	1.00	8	268	0	0	0	0	2
2LKR_A	-	0.65	0.56	0.76	22	6076	9	0	7	2	17
2LQZ_A	-	0.80	0.73	0.89	8	342	1	1	0	0	3
2LWK_A	-	0.88	0.85	0.92	11	484	1	0	1	0	2
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_a	-	0.71	0.56	0.90	9	1118	1	0	1	0	7
3J0L_1	-	0.70	0.58	0.85	11	1212	3	0	2	1	8
3J0L_h	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	29	6076	2	0	0	2	14
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1212	13	0	13	0	17
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	462	3	1	2	0	4
3J0L_2	-	0.64	0.61	0.69	20	6187	11	2	7	2	13
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.70	1.00	21	2829	1	0	0	1	9
3J2C_O	-	0.83	0.70	1.00	44	10252	1	0	0	1	19
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.62	1.00	33	7842	2	0	0	2	20
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	0	0	0	0	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	0	0	0	0	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.75	0.57	1.00	21	3139	0	0	0	0	16
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.70	0.90	28	4722	4	0	3	1	12
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.67	0.97	33	6987	1	0	1	0	16
3ZEX_E	-	0.08	0.06	0.10	5	21896	44	5	39	0	72
3ZEX_G	-	0.26	0.20	0.33	15	16426	34	2	28	4	59
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.63	0.97	34	7105	1	0	1	0	20
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.15	0.28	5	11763	26	0	13	13	28
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.40	0.68	17	4346	9	1	7	1	25
4ATO_G	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	526	2	0	2	0	10
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.47	1.00	9	1266	0	0	0	0	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.56	0.90	18	3466	2	1	1	0	14
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	444
Total TN	142333
Total FP	314
Total FP CONTRA	21
Total FP INCONS	268
Total FP COMP	25
Total FN	619

Total Scores
MCC	0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.614 ± 0.097
Sensitivity	0.418
Positive Predictive Value	0.606
Nr of predictions	41

^top

2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1527	13	0	13	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	8	343	1	0	0	1	3
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.31	0.28	0.34	11	6073	21	3	18	0	28
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
3J0L_8	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	4	186	0	0	0	0	4
3J0L_a	-	0.39	0.31	0.50	5	1118	5	2	3	0	11
3J0L_1	-	0.28	0.21	0.40	4	1215	6	1	5	0	15
3J0L_h	-	0.38	0.28	0.52	12	6082	11	0	11	0	31
3J0L_7	-	0.51	0.41	0.64	7	1214	4	0	4	0	10
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_2	-	0.38	0.36	0.41	12	6187	18	3	14	1	21
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.67	1.00	20	2755	0	0	0	0	10
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.70	0.73	16	2904	6	0	6	0	7
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.70	1.00	21	2829	1	0	0	1	9
3J2C_O	-	0.30	0.24	0.39	15	10258	24	0	23	1	48
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.45	0.73	24	7842	12	1	8	3	29
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.41	0.71	15	3549	6	1	5	0	22
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.58	0.79	23	4724	7	0	6	1	17
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.45	0.69	22	6989	10	0	10	0	27
3ZEX_E	-	0.08	0.06	0.11	5	21900	40	1	39	0	72
3ZEX_G	-	0.30	0.23	0.39	17	16427	27	2	25	0	57
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.22	0.32	12	7103	25	2	23	0	42
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.28	0.24	0.33	8	11757	28	0	16	12	25
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.33	0.54	14	4345	13	1	11	1	28
4ATO_G	-	0.32	0.30	0.38	3	520	5	1	4	0	7
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.47	1.00	9	1317	0	0	0	0	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.47	0.68	15	3464	7	1	6	0	17
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]