CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Vsfold5
MCC 0.674 > 0.433
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.095 > 0.554 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.563 > 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.813 > 0.510
Total TP 567 > 376
Total TN 130373 > 130333
Total FP 158 < 387
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 30
Total FP INCONS 116 < 331
Total FP COMP 28 > 26
Total FN 441 < 632
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 567
Total TN 130373
Total FP 158
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 116
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 441
Total Scores
MCC 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.813
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_O - 0.83 0.70 1.00 44 10252 1 0 0 1 19
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.10 5 21896 44 5 39 0 72
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 526 2 0 2 0 10
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 376
Total TN 130333
Total FP 387
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 331
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 632
Total Scores
MCC 0.433
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.510
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.27 0.23 0.32 9 6077 19 2 17 0 30
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.35 0.33 0.37 11 6186 21 3 16 2 22
3J0L_1 - 0.27 0.21 0.36 4 1214 7 1 6 0 15
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_h - 0.18 0.14 0.24 6 6080 19 1 18 0 37
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2C_O - 0.30 0.24 0.39 15 10258 24 0 23 1 48
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.76 0.70 0.82 28 4719 7 1 5 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZEX_E - 0.07 0.06 0.08 5 21886 54 5 49 0 72
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ATO_G - 0.56 0.60 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 4
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.