CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.548 > 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.092 > 0.580 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.474 > 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.637 > 0.614
Total TP 675 > 559
Total TN 280113 < 280261
Total FP 430 > 392
Total FP CONTRA 45 > 43
Total FP INCONS 339 > 309
Total FP COMP 46 > 40
Total FN 749 < 865
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 675
Total TN 280113
Total FP 430
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 339
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 749
Total Scores
MCC 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.637
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_a - 0.50 0.44 0.58 7 1116 5 2 3 0 9
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 464 1 1 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.75 0.65 0.88 28 6073 6 0 4 2 15
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1213 2 0 1 1 8
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 26 0 21 5 25
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 4 0 0 4 2
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2C_M - 0.43 0.34 0.53 71 106357 66 9 54 3 136
3J2C_O - 0.79 0.67 0.93 42 10251 4 0 3 1 21
3J2L_3 0.56 0.49 0.65 26 7835 16 0 14 2 27
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.28 0.24 0.33 18 16416 41 2 35 4 56
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21889 58 4 52 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.67 0.80 33 6980 8 1 7 0 16
3ZEX_H - 0.17 0.18 0.17 7 9003 35 6 29 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.21 0.38 11 14167 22 3 15 4 41
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ATO_G - 0.44 0.40 0.50 4 520 4 0 4 0 6
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.68 0.56 0.82 18 3464 4 1 3 0 14
4FRN_A 0.65 0.56 0.77 20 5125 6 1 5 0 16
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 559
Total TN 280261
Total FP 392
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 309
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 865
Total Scores
MCC 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.614
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.70 0.49 1.00 21 6084 0 0 0 0 22
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2C_M - 0.38 0.29 0.50 60 106370 64 11 50 3 147
3J2C_O - 0.62 0.49 0.78 31 10256 10 0 9 1 32
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2628 0 0 0 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16471 0 0 0 0 74
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 4 49 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9012 26 4 22 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 584 11 0 11 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.