CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Cylofold		Alterna
MCC	0.700	>	0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.690 ± 0.080	>	0.677 ± 0.087
Sensitivity	0.608	<	0.613
Positive Predictive Value	0.813	>	0.743
Total TP	520	<	524
Total TN	66327	>	66262
Total FP	141	<	211
Total FP CONTRA	21	<	24
Total FP INCONS	99	<	157
Total FP COMP	21	<	30
Total FN	335	>	331
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).
Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	520
Total TN	66327
Total FP	141
Total FP CONTRA	21
Total FP INCONS	99
Total FP COMP	21
Total FN	335

Total Scores
MCC	0.700
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.690 ± 0.080
Sensitivity	0.608
Positive Predictive Value	0.813
Nr of predictions	45

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.89	1.00	16	845	0	0	0	0	2
2KXM_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	346	0	0	0	0	5
2KZL_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	10	1475	0	0	0	0	9
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.84	1.00	21	2124	0	0	0	0	4
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	2060	0	0	0	0	4
2L2K_A	-	0.82	0.68	1.00	13	848	0	0	0	0	6
2L3C_B	-	0.76	0.59	1.00	10	551	0	0	0	0	7
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	27	2458	0	0	0	0	7
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	345	0	0	0	0	5
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.38	0.40	0.36	8	4538	23	7	7	9	12
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.78	0.84	21	2825	4	4	0	0	6
2Y9C_V	-	0.59	0.54	0.65	13	2258	8	1	6	1	11
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	3	8	0	12
2YIE_X	-	0.30	0.33	0.29	4	1364	10	2	8	0	8
3ADB_C	-	0.78	0.71	0.87	27	4155	4	0	4	0	11
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.76	16	2680	6	0	5	1	12
3AM1_B	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	22	3216	2	0	2	0	13
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.76	16	2982	7	0	5	2	11
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_a	-	0.22	0.19	0.27	3	1117	8	1	7	0	13
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_7	-	0.30	0.29	0.33	5	1210	10	0	10	0	12
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3NKB_B	-	0.40	0.31	0.53	8	2001	7	0	7	0	18
3NMU_E	-	0.20	0.17	0.25	1	557	6	1	2	3	5
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	584	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	549	0	0	0	0	1
3P22_G	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	730	0	0	0	0	1
3R4F_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.50	0.78	21	3889	6	0	6	0	21
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.42	1.00	5	401	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.38	0.54	14	3544	12	1	11	0	23

^top

Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	524
Total TN	66262
Total FP	211
Total FP CONTRA	24
Total FP INCONS	157
Total FP COMP	30
Total FN	331

Total Scores
MCC	0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.677 ± 0.087
Sensitivity	0.613
Positive Predictive Value	0.743
Nr of predictions	45

^top

2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.83	0.94	15	845	1	0	1	0	3
2KXM_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	346	0	0	0	0	5
2KZL_A	-	0.78	0.74	0.82	14	1468	3	1	2	0	5
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.96	1.00	24	2121	0	0	0	0	1
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.96	1.00	23	2057	0	0	0	0	1
2L2K_A	-	0.94	0.89	1.00	17	844	0	0	0	0	2
2L3C_B	-	0.91	0.82	1.00	14	547	0	0	0	0	3
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.88	1.00	30	2455	0	0	0	0	4
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.40	0.53	8	1525	7	0	7	0	12
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.45	0.45	9	4540	25	0	11	14	11
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.76	16	2829	5	0	5	0	11
2Y9C_V	-	0.65	0.63	0.68	15	2256	8	1	6	1	9
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	3	12	0	12
2YIE_X	-	0.36	0.33	0.40	4	1368	9	2	4	3	8
3ADB_C	-	0.59	0.55	0.64	21	4153	12	0	12	0	17
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.39	0.42	11	2675	15	4	11	0	17
3AM1_B	-	0.61	0.57	0.67	20	3210	10	1	9	0	15
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.59	0.70	16	2980	9	0	7	2	11
3J0L_1	-	0.61	0.53	0.71	10	1211	6	0	4	2	9
3J0L_a	-	0.23	0.19	0.30	3	1118	7	1	6	0	13
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	456	9	4	5	0	4
3J0L_7	-	0.26	0.24	0.31	4	1212	9	0	9	0	13
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.53	0.76	16	2754	5	1	4	0	14
3NKB_B	-	0.35	0.31	0.42	8	1997	11	0	11	0	18
3NMU_E	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	553	10	2	6	2	6
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	584	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	549	0	0	0	0	1
3P22_G	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	730	0	0	0	0	1
3R4F_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.56	0.86	19	2189	3	1	2	0	15
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.38	0.57	16	3888	12	1	11	0	26
3SIU_F	-	0.59	0.55	0.67	6	369	3	0	3	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	2	0	0	2	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.43	0.64	16	3545	9	2	7	0	21

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]