CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Cylofold		MCFold
MCC	0.641	>	0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.673 ± 0.062	>	0.584 ± 0.082
Sensitivity	0.550	<	0.562
Positive Predictive Value	0.754	>	0.532
Total TP	878	<	896
Total TN	170350	>	169832
Total FP	328	<	906
Total FP CONTRA	39	<	70
Total FP INCONS	248	<	717
Total FP COMP	41	<	119
Total FN	717	>	699
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	878
Total TN	170350
Total FP	328
Total FP CONTRA	39
Total FP INCONS	248
Total FP COMP	41
Total FN	717

Total Scores
MCC	0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.673 ± 0.062
Sensitivity	0.550
Positive Predictive Value	0.754
Nr of predictions	69

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.89	1.00	16	845	0	0	0	0	2
2KXM_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	346	0	0	0	0	5
2KZL_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	10	1475	0	0	0	0	9
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	2060	0	0	0	0	4
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.84	1.00	21	2124	0	0	0	0	4
2L2K_A	-	0.82	0.68	1.00	13	848	0	0	0	0	6
2L3C_B	-	0.76	0.59	1.00	10	551	0	0	0	0	7
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	27	2458	0	0	0	0	7
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	345	0	0	0	0	5
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.50	0.44	0.59	17	6076	12	2	10	0	22
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2M58_A	-	0.51	0.41	0.64	7	1642	4	1	3	0	10
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.38	0.40	0.36	8	4538	23	7	7	9	12
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.78	0.84	21	2825	4	4	0	0	6
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.10	0.10	0.11	4	5115	32	1	31	0	38
2Y9C_V	-	0.59	0.54	0.65	13	2258	8	1	6	1	11
2YIE_X	-	0.30	0.33	0.29	4	1364	10	2	8	0	8
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	3	8	0	12
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.76	16	2680	6	0	5	1	12
3AM1_B	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	22	3216	2	0	2	0	13
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.76	16	2982	7	0	5	2	11
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	6867	6	0	6	0	24
3J0L_7	-	0.30	0.29	0.33	5	1210	10	0	10	0	12
3J0L_2	-	0.39	0.36	0.43	12	6188	18	2	14	2	21
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_h	-	0.48	0.37	0.62	16	6079	10	0	10	0	27
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_a	-	0.22	0.19	0.27	3	1117	8	1	7	0	13
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	1	4	1	13
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.43	0.72	23	7843	11	0	9	2	30
3NDB_M	-	0.58	0.48	0.71	29	9139	13	1	11	1	32
3NKB_B	-	0.40	0.31	0.53	8	2001	7	0	7	0	18
3NMU_E	-	0.20	0.17	0.25	1	557	6	1	2	3	5
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.34	0.38	12	12371	29	5	15	9	23
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.68	0.93	26	7232	3	0	2	1	12
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	584	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	549	0	0	0	0	1
3P22_G	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	730	0	0	0	0	1
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	39	12839	4	0	2	2	33
3R4F_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.50	0.78	21	3889	6	0	6	0	21
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.42	1.00	5	401	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.49	0.69	24	6986	11	0	11	0	25
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.39	0.41	9	2981	15	2	11	2	14
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.73	0.70	0.78	7	519	2	1	1	0	3
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4
4FNJ_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	8	587	0	0	0	0	8
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	3465	0	0	0	0	11
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.14	0.31	5	5135	11	2	9	0	31
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	896
Total TN	169832
Total FP	906
Total FP CONTRA	70
Total FP INCONS	717
Total FP COMP	119
Total FN	699

Total Scores
MCC	0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.584 ± 0.082
Sensitivity	0.562
Positive Predictive Value	0.532
Nr of predictions	69

^top

2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.89	0.94	16	844	2	0	1	1	2
2KXM_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	341	1	0	0	1	0
2KZL_A	-	0.80	0.84	0.76	16	1464	9	1	4	4	3
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.75	0.69	18	2054	9	0	8	1	6
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.76	0.70	19	2118	9	0	8	1	6
2L2K_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	19	842	1	0	0	1	0
2L3C_B	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	16	545	0	0	0	0	1
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	582	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	34	2451	0	0	0	0	0
2L5Z_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	314	0	0	0	0	1
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	615	15	0	15	0	19
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.45	0.39	9	1517	16	0	14	2	11
2LDL_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	341	2	0	0	2	1
2LDT_A	-	0.75	0.73	0.79	11	451	3	0	3	0	4
2LI4_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	481	0	0	0	0	1
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	266	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.93	0.92	0.95	36	6067	14	0	2	12	3
2LWK_A	-	0.92	0.92	0.92	12	483	2	0	1	1	1
2M58_A	-	0.20	0.24	0.18	4	1631	19	2	16	1	13
2RRC_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	1
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.25	0.17	5	4530	37	2	23	12	15
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.37	0.32	10	2819	22	1	20	1	17
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.24	0.24	10	5110	32	1	30	1	32
2Y9C_V	-	0.62	0.67	0.59	16	2251	13	2	9	2	8
2YIE_X	-	0.06	0.08	0.06	1	1361	21	1	15	5	11
2YIE_Z	-	0.36	0.50	0.27	6	1518	18	4	12	2	6
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.43	0.39	12	2670	19	3	16	0	16
3AM1_B	-	0.93	0.89	0.97	31	3208	2	0	1	1	4
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.48	0.42	13	2972	18	2	16	0	14
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	37	6853	14	0	13	1	17
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1206	19	4	15	0	17
3J0L_2	-	0.21	0.24	0.18	8	6172	39	7	29	3	25
3J0L_g	-	0.13	0.25	0.08	1	452	12	8	4	0	3
3J0L_h	-	0.91	0.91	0.91	39	6062	13	0	4	9	4
3J0L_1	-	0.79	0.79	0.79	15	1206	6	0	4	2	4
3J0L_a	-	0.16	0.19	0.17	3	1110	15	1	14	0	13
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.47	0.44	14	2743	19	1	17	1	16
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.57	0.63	17	2823	12	1	9	2	13
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.57	0.60	30	7825	23	2	18	3	23
3NDB_M	-	0.23	0.23	0.24	14	9121	46	1	44	1	47
3NKB_B	-	0.56	0.58	0.56	15	1989	13	0	12	1	11
3NMU_E	-	0.28	0.33	0.25	2	553	12	0	6	6	4
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.26	0.19	9	12355	45	9	30	6	26
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.24	0.17	9	7208	44	5	38	1	29
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	584	2	0	0	2	0
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	548	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	729	5	0	0	5	0
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.61	0.72	44	12819	19	0	17	2	28
3R4F_A	-	0.92	0.92	0.92	23	2120	5	0	2	3	2
3R9X_C	-	0.69	0.70	0.70	7	585	7	0	3	4	3
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.65	0.76	22	2182	7	1	6	0	12
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.33	0.33	0.35	14	3876	26	0	26	0	28
3SIU_F	-	0.42	0.45	0.42	5	366	7	1	6	0	6
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.58	0.54	7	393	6	0	6	0	5
3TRZ_Z	-	-0.04	0.00	0.00	0	201	9	0	9	0	6
3TS2_V	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	268	9	0	8	1	5
3U4M_B	-	0.59	0.59	0.59	22	3123	15	0	15	0	15
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	617	1	0	0	1	0
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.17	0.18	0.18	9	6970	42	4	38	0	40
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.22	0.18	5	2975	26	1	22	3	18
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.30	0.30	0.33	3	519	8	0	6	2	7
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.63	0.60	12	1255	8	2	6	0	7
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.28	0.32	0.27	6	1304	17	2	14	1	13
4FNJ_A	-	0.83	0.81	0.87	13	580	3	0	2	1	3
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.34	0.31	11	3450	25	0	25	0	21
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.12	0.14	0.12	5	5110	38	1	35	2	31
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	4	0	0	4	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]